<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Phone: My Chat with Laurent for Round 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/</link>
	<description>A Blog by A Lab on Fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: StickyKeys</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>StickyKeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 01:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>And then what do you know?   K went ahead and blew my mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then what do you know?   K went ahead and blew my mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StickyKeys</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>StickyKeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>I just received the next samples and I must take time to make note of the packaging.  Hermetically sealed vials encased in bubble wrap within a standard addressed envelope?  Leaps and bounds from the days of plastic vials and ziplock baggies!  Next time I shall expect a male model designed to be my own personal sprayer!  

I currently am wearing I on my left wrist, K on my right wrist, and J on my bosom.  I&#039;m still getting an initial soapiness, but the drydown (see? I&#039;m learning, umm, unless I used that incorrectly) was fabulous.  Particularly of J which seems to have some sweeter notes that I enjoy, it&#039;s almost floral.

I is the most perfumey (well, I tried!).  It smells most like.. a perfume.  Actually, let me explain K and J and maybe that will put I in a better perspective.

K has a lot of leather in its midsection.  It&#039;s not quite manly, but a little brut.  Like something a man might like smelling on his wife, but still very feminine.  Almost matronly though.  Like, for the authoritative woman.  It seems less warm than the others.

J has fabulous floral notes, but they seem to be muted by a disinfectant like note.  Perhaps when it wears a bit longer it will rest into those notes, but there&#039;s something that seems to be blocking it.  

Which brings me back to I.  It doesn&#039;t smell like flowers, or like leather, or like dew on a soft spring day, it smells like classic vintage perfumery.

I&#039;ll carry them around and do another comment closer to the end of the week, but that&#039;s the starter.  I love I, and think that J has great potential.  K is lovely, but it&#039;s just not to my current liking.  That may change by the end of the week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just received the next samples and I must take time to make note of the packaging.  Hermetically sealed vials encased in bubble wrap within a standard addressed envelope?  Leaps and bounds from the days of plastic vials and ziplock baggies!  Next time I shall expect a male model designed to be my own personal sprayer!  </p>
<p>I currently am wearing I on my left wrist, K on my right wrist, and J on my bosom.  I&#8217;m still getting an initial soapiness, but the drydown (see? I&#8217;m learning, umm, unless I used that incorrectly) was fabulous.  Particularly of J which seems to have some sweeter notes that I enjoy, it&#8217;s almost floral.</p>
<p>I is the most perfumey (well, I tried!).  It smells most like.. a perfume.  Actually, let me explain K and J and maybe that will put I in a better perspective.</p>
<p>K has a lot of leather in its midsection.  It&#8217;s not quite manly, but a little brut.  Like something a man might like smelling on his wife, but still very feminine.  Almost matronly though.  Like, for the authoritative woman.  It seems less warm than the others.</p>
<p>J has fabulous floral notes, but they seem to be muted by a disinfectant like note.  Perhaps when it wears a bit longer it will rest into those notes, but there&#8217;s something that seems to be blocking it.  </p>
<p>Which brings me back to I.  It doesn&#8217;t smell like flowers, or like leather, or like dew on a soft spring day, it smells like classic vintage perfumery.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll carry them around and do another comment closer to the end of the week, but that&#8217;s the starter.  I love I, and think that J has great potential.  K is lovely, but it&#8217;s just not to my current liking.  That may change by the end of the week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuri</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>kuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t have much to say about Katie&#039;s message, as she says it all.

I will have to go back and smell C.  I did like mod G though.  After various people pointed it out, I do see the soapiness.  However, I tried Les Parfums de Rosine Roseberry yesterday and wow, that had a soapy opening!  The mods have only faint soapiness next to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have much to say about Katie&#8217;s message, as she says it all.</p>
<p>I will have to go back and smell C.  I did like mod G though.  After various people pointed it out, I do see the soapiness.  However, I tried Les Parfums de Rosine Roseberry yesterday and wow, that had a soapy opening!  The mods have only faint soapiness next to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StickyKeys</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>StickyKeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 05:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwedoissecret.org/madebyblog/2006/10/10/on-the-phone-my-chat-with-laurent-for-round-3/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; One such example I cited was the growl smoothly contained in vintage Chantilly (as opposed to the triviality it has now become.)&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, exactly.  I didn&#039;t know that it used to include true animal notes though.  I don&#039;t mind that so much, but man, the things we used to do.


&lt;i&gt;We also discussed other choices for notes, one such being use of a honey note&lt;/i&gt;

Honey notes work lovely on my skin, but I know not everyone is so fortunate.  But what an interesting idea!


&lt;i&gt;While it’s my imagination that spaked the creation, when it comes down to it, the entire project should be credited to his work and his creativity. I have this terrible fear that if I try to insert myself too much into his own ideas, Auxeos will meet some laughable Wile E. Coyote end.&lt;/i&gt; 

Hee!  You are a very sweet girl Katie.  I&#039;m sure the frangrance will be great for both of you.


I agree with you about mod G, I think it is the most natural progression from mod C (which was the fan fave in these parts).  I took a rest from them, and will be trying again soon.  I&#039;m still getting that weird smokey smell, but now that I think about it, soapy might be a more apropos definition.  I can see where the two meet in that regard.  I&#039;m looking forward to seeing more of this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> One such example I cited was the growl smoothly contained in vintage Chantilly (as opposed to the triviality it has now become.)</i></p>
<p>Yes, exactly.  I didn&#8217;t know that it used to include true animal notes though.  I don&#8217;t mind that so much, but man, the things we used to do.</p>
<p><i>We also discussed other choices for notes, one such being use of a honey note</i></p>
<p>Honey notes work lovely on my skin, but I know not everyone is so fortunate.  But what an interesting idea!</p>
<p><i>While it’s my imagination that spaked the creation, when it comes down to it, the entire project should be credited to his work and his creativity. I have this terrible fear that if I try to insert myself too much into his own ideas, Auxeos will meet some laughable Wile E. Coyote end.</i> </p>
<p>Hee!  You are a very sweet girl Katie.  I&#8217;m sure the frangrance will be great for both of you.</p>
<p>I agree with you about mod G, I think it is the most natural progression from mod C (which was the fan fave in these parts).  I took a rest from them, and will be trying again soon.  I&#8217;m still getting that weird smokey smell, but now that I think about it, soapy might be a more apropos definition.  I can see where the two meet in that regard.  I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing more of this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

